New story in Technology from Time: The New ‘God of War’ Game Is Unlike Any You’ve Played Before

There are many things that come naturally to Kratos, the barbaric demi-god that’s been the face of one of Sony’s most successful PlayStation franchises for more than a decade. He can wield the Blades of Chaos with expert deftness to slay hordes of assailants in a few swift swings. He’s scaled the seemingly impregnable Mount Olympus and left countless corpses in his wake. He’s subdued colossal monsters more than 10 times his size, like God of War III’s tentacled brute Poseidon and God of War Ascension’s snarling, fire-breathing Manticore.

But when we see Kratos for the first time in five years in the upcoming God of War, something seems off. The vengeance-driven rage that’s driven him until this point is gone — for now, at least. Yet it’s evident that he’s still very much coping with an internal struggle. This is apparent when Kratos’ young son Atreus fumbles his shot at a nearby deer while learning to hunt in the game’s opening chapter. Kratos grows angry, showing traces of that familiar Spartan temper — but his temper fades quickly.

Read more: Inside HQ Trivia’s Intense Question-Writing Process

It’s moments like these that set the tone for the newest God of War installment, which launches April 20 and focuses on Kratos’s struggle to learn what it means to be human. The first hour or so of gameplay exposes a lot about the relationship between Kratos and his son and how it will impact their journey together. What Kratos says to Atreus, how he says them, and the way he looks or doesn’t look at his son when they interact reveals much about their dynamic. To the player, it’s immediately clear that being a father is foreign to Kratos. He wants to protect his son from the terrors of the world, but he’s not certain how.

It’s a stark departure from the Kratos we’ve met in years past, who used his festering anger and resentment to seek revenge on Hades for tricking him into killing his family. In the new God of War, Kratos is getting a second chance at being a father. It’s a burden that visibly weighs on him as much as he may try to hide it.

“He just understands [that] he’s broken,” says God of War creative director Cory Barlog. “His kid is how he’ll figure out how to fix himself.”

Courtesy of SonyThe new God of War game for the PS4

Previously, God of War was a blood-soaked, Greek mythology-inspired tale of revenge. Now it’s about family and the human experience. The Kratos we meet in the new God of War game has undergone a transformation, but he still has a long way to go. “I wanted to start after he’s done some work,” says Barlog. “[He’s] spent a lot of his days out alone trying to manage the demons inside him and constantly failing.”

Yes, the next God of War game will have a different feel that may seem more story-driven than its predecessors. But longtime fans need not worry. The new game is rife with brutal battles and ferocious foes, which Kratos confronts with his new Leviathan axe instead of his typical Blades of Chaos. Kratos is now in a snow-covered world ruled by the Norse Gods that’s just as beautiful as it is dangerous and unfamiliar. The details are riveting and vivid: everything from deers’ wafting strands of hair to the way light bounces off of nearby puddles and the markings on Kratos’ skin appears genuine.

Although the story, approach, and setting are new, players find themselves in familiar territory fairly quickly. In this early chapter, Kratos must take down a hulking gargantuan troll attempting to pulverize him with a supersized wooden post. Defeating the creature involves learning its attack pattern and appropriately timing your dodges and strikes. Atreus can assist with this by flinging arrows at the beast, distracting it from Kratos and therefore providing an opportunity to attack or escape. Players will see Atreus’ abilities evolve as the game progresses, says Barlog, and there will be an option to upgrade his skills later on.

Read more: Nintendo’s Newest Products Are Switch Accessories You Can Build Yourself

The controls are simple: Kratos has strong and weak attacks that you can string together to unleash slick, punishing combos. The former type is slower but more powerful as its name implies, while the latter is quick and ideal for moments in which you have a very short window to strike. The combat mechanics are buttery smooth just like in the previous games — I was able to obliterate groups of smaller minion enemies with just a few swings of Kratos’ hefty axe. Some adversaries are impervious to your weapon, so you’ll have to grow comfortable with using your fists to pummel them too. But you’ll be rewarded for doing so, as fighting with your fists and shooting arrows can fill up your stun meter, which lets you execute an ultra-savage finishing blow.

Courtesy of SonyThe new God of War game for the PS4

If the first hour of gameplay is any indication of the game as a whole, players can expect a diverse mix of battle styles. While the troll I encountered attacked slowly but powerfully and left easily exploitable openings, other enemies will try to disorient Kratos with sheer speed. God of War has always found interesting ways to play with the environment, and that’s no different in this new entrant. During one of the brawls I experienced, Kratos and his opponent pounded one another through trees, barricades, and anything else that may have stood in their path. It’s just as marvelous to watch these scenes unfold as it is to participate in them.

A goal with this game, says Barlog, was to surprise anyone with a preconceived perception about Kratos — and God of War in general. But the inspiration for Kratos’ metamorphosis came from a source more complex than any work of fiction: real life. “A lot of this,” says Barlog, “comes from [us] putting the camera on ourselves.”

New story in Technology from Time: Facebook’s Stock Is Plummeting Amid the Company’s Latest Crisis. Here’s What’s Going On

Facebook Inc. shares fell the most in two months Monday as American and European officials demanded answers to reports that a political advertising firm retained information on millions of Facebook users without their consent.

Politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are calling on Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg to appear before lawmakers to explain how U.K.-based Cambridge Analytica, the advertising-data firm that helped Donald Trump win the U.S. presidency, was able to harvest the personal data.

Facebook has already testified about how its platform was used by Russian propagandists ahead of the 2016 election, but the company never put Zuckerberg himself in the spotlight with government leaders. The pressure may also foreshadow tougher regulation for the social network.

A top U.K. lawmaker on Monday backed sweeping new powers for the nation’s privacy watchdog.

“The time has now come for us to look at giving more powers to the information commission in the U.K.,” Damian Collins, a Conservative and chair of the U.K. Digital, Culture, Media and Sports Committee, told LBC radio in an interview on Monday.

Facebook on Friday said that a professor used Facebook’s log-in tools to get people to sign up for what he claimed was a personality-analysis app he had designed for academic purposes. To take the quiz, 270,000 people gave the app permission to access data via Facebook on themselves and their friends, exposing a network of 50 million people, according to the New York Times. That kind of access was allowed per Facebook’s rules at the time. Afterward, the professor violated Facebook’s terms when he passed along that data to Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook fell as much as 5.2 percent to $175.41 Monday in New York, wiping out all of the year’s gains so far. It was the biggest intraday drop since Jan. 12.

Zuckerberg’s Fortune Falls $3.8 Billion Over Data Exploitation

Facebook found out about the breach in 2015, shut down the professor’s access and asked Cambridge Analytica to certify that it had deleted the user data. Yet the social network on Friday suspended Cambridge from its system, explaining that it had learned the information wasn’t erased. Cambridge, originally funded by conservative political donor Robert Mercer, on Saturday denied that it still had access to the user data, and said it was working with Facebook on a solution.

A researcher who worked with the professor on the app is now currently an employee at Facebook, which is reviewing whether he knew about the data leak.

The denials and refutations did little to ease the criticism. Damian Collins, a British lawmaker, said Sunday that Zuckerberg or another senior executive should appear in front of his committee because previous witnesses have avoided difficult questions, creating “a false reassurance that Facebook’s stated policies are always robust and effectively policed.’’ He added in an interview on British radio Monday that Zuckerberg should “stop hiding behind his Facebook page and actually come out and answer questions about his company.”

The next few weeks represent a critical time for Facebook to reassure users and regulators about its content standards and platform security, to prevent rules that could impact its main advertising business, according to Daniel Ives, an analyst at GBH Insights.

“Changes to their business model around advertising and news feeds/content could be in store over the next 12 to 18 months,” Ives wrote in a note to investors.

Facebook, meanwhile, has sought to explain that the mishandling of user data was out of its hands and doesn’t constitute a “breach” – a definition that would require the company to alert users about whether their information was taken, per U.S. Federal Trade Commission rules.

Menlo Park, California-based Facebook no longer allows app developers to ask for access to data on users’ friends. But the improper handling of the data raises systemic questions about how much companies can be trusted to protect personal information, said Nuala O’Connor, president and CEO of the Center for Democracy & Technology.

“While the misuse of data is not new, what we now see is how seemingly insignificant information about individuals can be used to decide what information they see and influence viewpoints in profound ways,” O’Connor said in a statement. “Communications technologies have become an essential part of our daily lives, but if we are unable to have control of our data, these technologies control us. For our democracy to thrive, this cannot continue.”

New story in Technology from Time: Apple Is Using a Secret Facility to Do Something It’s Never Done Before

Apple Inc. is designing and producing its own device displays for the first time, using a secret manufacturing facility near its California headquarters to make small numbers of the screens for testing purposes, according to people familiar with the situation.

The technology giant is making a significant investment in the development of next-generation MicroLED screens, say the people, who requested anonymity to discuss internal planning. MicroLED screens use different light-emitting compounds than the current OLED displays and promise to make future gadgets slimmer, brighter and less power-hungry.

The screens are far more difficult to produce than OLED displays, and the company almost killed the project a year or so ago, the people say. Engineers have since been making progress and the technology is now at an advanced stage, they say, though consumers will probably have to wait a few years before seeing the results.

The ambitious undertaking is the latest example of Apple bringing the design of key components in-house. The company has designed chips powering its mobile devices for several years. Its move into displays has the long-term potential to hurt a range of suppliers, from screen makers like Samsung Electronics Co., Japan Display Inc., Sharp Corp. and LG Display Co. to companies like Synaptics Inc. that produce chip-screen interfaces. It may also hurt Universal Display Corp., a leading developer of OLED technology.

Display makers in Asia fell after Bloomberg News reported the plans. Japan Display dropped as much as 4.4 percent, Sharp tumbled as much as 3.3 percent and Samsung slid 1.4 percent. Shares in Apple were down 1.3 percent during early trading at 5:21 a.m. in New York.

Controlling MicroLED technology would help Apple stand out in a maturing smartphone market and outgun rivals like Samsung that have been able to tout superior screens. Ray Soneira, who runs screen tester DisplayMate Technologies, says bringing the design in-house is a “golden opportunity” for Apple. “Everyone can buy an OLED or LCD screen,” he says. “But Apple could own MicroLED.”

None of this will be easy. Mass producing the new screens will require new manufacturing equipment. By the time the technology is ready, something else might have supplanted it. Apple could run into insurmountable hurdles and abandon the project or push it back. It’s also an expensive endeavor.

Ultimately, Apple will likely outsource production of its new screen technology to minimize the risk of hurting its bottom line with manufacturing snafus. The California facility is too small for mass-production, but the company wants to keep the proprietary technology away from its partners as long as possible, one of the people says. “We put a lot of money into the facility,” this person says. “It’s big enough to get through the engineering builds [and] lets us keep everything in-house during the development stages.”

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment.

Right now smartphones and other gadgets essentially use off-the-shelf display technology. The Apple Watch screen is made by LG Display. Ditto for Google’s larger Pixel phone. The iPhone X, Apple’s first OLED phone, uses Samsung technology. Phone manufacturers tweak screens to their specifications, and Apple has for years calibrated iPhone screens for color accuracy. But this marks the first time Apple is designing screens end-to-end itself.

The secret initiative, code-named T159, is overseen by executive Lynn Youngs, an Apple veteran who helped develop touch screens for the original iPhone and iPad and now oversees iPhone and Apple Watch screen technology.

The 62,000-square-foot manufacturing facility, the first of its kind for Apple, is located on an otherwise unremarkable street in Santa Clara, California, a 15-minute drive from the Apple Park campus in Cupertino and near a few other unmarked Apple offices. There, about 300 engineers are designing and producing MicroLED screens for use in future products. The facility also has a special area for the intricate process of “growing” LEDs.

Another facility nearby houses technology that handles so-called LED transfers: the process of placing individual pixels into a MicroLED screen. Apple inherited the intellectual property for that process when it purchased startup LuxVue in 2014.

About a year after that acquisition, Apple opened a display research lab (described internally as a “Technology Center”) in Taiwan. In a test to see if the company could pull off in-house display manufacturing, engineers in Taiwan first built a small number of LCD screens using Apple technology. They were assembled at the Santa Clara factory and retrofitted into iPhone 7 prototypes. Apple executives tested them, then gave the display team the go-ahead to move forward with the development of Apple-designed MicroLED screens.

The complexity of building a screen manufacturing facility meant it took Apple several months to get the California plant operational. Only in recent months have Apple engineers grown confident in their ability to eventually replace screens from Samsung and other suppliers.

In late 2017, for the first time, engineers managed to manufacture fully functional MicroLED screens for future Apple Watches; the company aims to make the new technology available first in its wearable computers. While still at least a couple of years away from reaching consumers — assuming the company decides to proceed — producing a functional MicroLED Apple Watch prototype is a significant milestone for a company that in the past designed hardware to be produced by others.

The latest MicroLED Apple Watch prototypes aren’t fully functioning wearables; instead the screen portion is connected to an external computer board. The screens are notably brighter than the current OLED Watch displays, and engineers have a finer level of control over individual colors, according to a person who has seen them. Executives recently approved continued development for the next two years, with the aim of shipping MicroLED screens in products.

It’s unlikely that the technology will reach an iPhone for at least three to five years, the people say. While the smartphone is Apple’s cash cow, there is precedent for new screen technologies showing up in the Apple Watch first. When it was introduced in 2014, the Apple Watch had an OLED screen. The technology finally migrated to the iPhone X last year.

Creating MicroLED screens is extraordinarily complex. Depending on screen size, they can contain millions of individual pixels. Each has three sub-pixels: red, green and blue LEDs. Each of these tiny LEDs must be individually created and calibrated. Each piece comes from what is known as a “donor wafer” and then are mass-transferred to the MicroLED screen. Early in the process, Apple bought these wafers from third-party manufacturers like Epistar Corp. and Osram Licht AG but has since begun “growing” its own LEDs to make in-house donor wafers. The growing process is done inside a clean room at the Santa Clara facility.

Engineers at the facility are also assembling prototype MicroLED screens, right down to attaching the screen to the glass. The backplanes, an underlying component that electronically powers the displays, are developed at the Taiwan facility. Apple is also designing its own thin-film transistors and screen drivers, key components in display assemblies. Currently, the Santa Clara facility is capable of manufacturing a handful of fully operational Apple Watch-sized (under 2 inches diagonally) MicroLED screens at a time.

Until MicroLED is ready for the world to see, Apple will still — at least publicly — be all-in on OLED. The company plans to release a second OLED iPhone in the fall, a giant, 6.5-inch model, and is working to expand OLED production from Samsung to also include LG.

New story in Technology from Time: Mark Zuckerberg Told to ‘Stop Hiding Behind his Facebook Page’ After Reports of Data Breach

(LONDON) — Lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic criticized Facebook and its chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, after reports surfaced that another company, Cambridge Analytica, improperly harvested information from 50 million Facebook users.

A British lawmaker accused Facebook on Sunday of misleading officials by downplaying the risk of users’ data being shared without their consent.

Conservative legislator Damian Collins, who heads the British Parliament’s media committee, said he would ask Zuckerberg or another Facebook executive to appear before his panel, which is investigating disinformation and “fake news.”

Collins said Facebook has “consistently understated” the risk of data leaks and gave misleading answers to the committee.

“Someone has to take responsibility for this,” he said. “It’s time for Mark Zuckerberg to stop hiding behind his Facebook page.”

Collins also accused the head of the U.K.-based data firm Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, of lying. Nix told the committee last month that his firm had not received data from a researcher accused of obtaining millions of Facebook users’ personal information.

In Washington, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said on Twitter that Zuckerberg “needs to testify before Senate Judiciary.”

“This is a major breach that must be investigated,” Klobuchar, a member of the Judiciary Committee, said. “It’s clear these platforms can’t police themselves.”

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, echoed Klobuchar’s complaint.

“This is more evidence that the online political advertising market is essentially the Wild West,” he said. “It’s clear that, left unregulated, this market will continue to be prone to deception and lacking in transparency.”

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said on Twitter that “Massachusetts residents deserve answers” and announced that her office will investigate.

The officials reacted to reports in The New York Times and The Guardian of London that Cambridge Analytica, which is best known for working on President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, had improperly obtained Facebook user data and retained it after claiming it had deleted the information.

Former Cambridge Analytica employee Chris Wylie said that the company obtained information from 50 million Facebook users, using it to build psychological profiles so voters could be targeted with ads and stories.

Wylie told Britain’s Channel 4 news that the company was able to amass a huge database very quickly from an app developed by an academic that vacuumed up data from Facebook users who agreed to fill out a survey, as well as their friends and contacts — a process of which most were unaware.

“Imagine I go and ask you: I say, ‘Hey, if I give you a dollar, two dollars, could you fill up this survey for me, just do it on this app’, and you say, ‘Fine,’” he said. “I don’t just capture what your responses are, I capture all of the information about you from Facebook. But also this app then crawls through your social network and captures all of that data also.”

Wylie said that allowed the company to get roughly “50 million plus” Facebook records in several months and he criticized Facebook for facilitating the process.

“Why Facebook didn’t make more inquiries when they started seeing that, you know, tens of millions of records were being pulled this way, I don’t know,” he said.

Lawmaker Collins said he would summon Nix to reappear before the Parliament committee.

“It seems clear that he has deliberately misled the committee and Parliament by giving false statements,” Collins said.

New story in Technology from Time: Feds: Russian Hackers Are Attacking U.S. Power Plants

Officials in Washington say that Russian hackers are in the midst of a widespread attack on crucial components of U.S. infrastructure, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report released Thursday.

The targets of these attacks include the country’s electric grid, including its nuclear power system, as well as “commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors,” the statement said.

The report is damning confirmation of what has for months been suspected: that hackers in Russia are capable of infiltrating and compromising vital systems relied on by millions of Americans. According to the new report, the attacks began at least as early as March 2016, thriving on vulnerabilities in these systems’ online operations.

“In some cases, information posted to company websites, especially information that may appear to be innocuous, may contain operationally sensitive information,” the report reads. “As an example, the threat actors downloaded a small photo from a publicly accessible human resources page. The image, when expanded, was a high-resolution photo that displayed control systems equipment models and status information in the background.”

The hacking efforts relied on the tactic known as “spear-phishing”: sending targets emails from what appear to be legitimate sources, such as Gmail, in an effort to get them to disclose private information like personal passwords.

“Upon gaining access to intended victims, the threat actors conducted reconnaissance operations within the network,” the report reads. “DHS observed the threat actors focusing on identifying and browsing file servers within the intended victim’s network.”

The report cites a widely circulated investigation from Symantec released in October 2017 that linked the hacking group Dragonfly, suspected to be Russian, to a series of attacks on energy systems in the U.S. and Europe.

Bloomberg reports that victims of the attacks included a nuclear power plant located in Kansas.

The new report came on the same day that the U.S. government announced new sanctions against Russia over the country’s reported interference in the 2016 presidential election.

New story in Technology from Time: Uber’s Biggest Rival Is Experimenting With All-You-Can-Ride Monthly Subscriptions

Uber rival Lyft appears to be testing monthly subscriptions for the ride-hailing service.

Some Lyft users are posting on Twitter about receiving subscription offers from Lyft, with pricing varying from $249 for an “all-access plan,” $199 a month for 30 rides, $300 for the same number of rides or $399 for 60 rides, according to The Verge.

The offer would include individual rides up to $15 dollars, and seems to target users spending $450 or more a month on Lyft. The offers did not say how rides over $15 would be charged.

https://twitter.com/search?q=lyft%20subscription%20&src=typd

Uber tested out a similar subscription service in 2016, The Verge noted, but the feature was never widely released.

TIME reached out to Lyft for comment, but did not receive an immediate response.

New story in Technology from Time: The 3 Biggest Things Apple May Be About to Announce

Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference, or WWDC, will begin on June 4, the company recently announced.

WWDC is one of Apple’s biggest events of the year, giving it a chance to preview what’s in store for gadgets from the iPhone to the Mac and beyond.

The headlining news is usually a look at the next version of Apple’s iPhone and iPad software, called iOS. Apple typically uses WWDC to show off the new features coming to the iPhone and iPad in the following months. But Apple may take a different approach this year, focusing less on flashy new features and more on performance upgrades.

Here’s look at what to expect from Apple’s WWDC 2018.

Get the latest deals, reviews and recommendations from the editors of TIME: sign up for The Goods newsletter here

Apps that work across iPhone and Mac

Apple may introduce a way for developers to create apps that will work across both its iOS and Mac OS devices, according to a 2017 report from Bloomberg. If Apple is planning to make such an announcement, WWDC certainly seems like the appropriate venue, with thousands of app creators in attendance. Such apps would be compatible with a touchscreen as well as a trackpad and mouse depending on the device they’re running on, says the report.

The multi-platform app approach would make sense for Apple, which has been positioning the iPad as more of a laptop replacement in recent years, particularly since the iPad Pro launched in 2015. Last year’s iOS 11 update, for example, was all about bringing new productivity-focused features to the iPad, such as a bigger dock at the bottom of the home screen and a file manager app. Allowing developers to create apps that work seamlessly on the Mac and a mobile device like the iPad Pro is a natural next step in that direction.

Apple would also be taking a page from Microsoft, which already lets app creators develop universal programs that are compatible across all devices that run on its Windows software.

Read more: Review: The XPS 13 is My Favorite Windows Laptop. It Just Got Even Better.

iOS 12 and more

Apple always previews the new features coming to iPhones and iPads during WWDC, and this year’s conference will probably be no different. What is likely to change, however, is the content of those updates.

Apple is said to be taking a new direction with its next mobile software update, presumably called iOS 12, that will concentrate more on performance and reliability than new features, according to Axios. The move would come after Apple has been criticized following a slew of software-related issues in recent months. One iPhone bug autocorrected the letter “i” to “A,” another caused some iPhones to crash once the clock hit 12:15 a.m. on Dec. 2. More seriously, a Mac vulnerability made it possible for intruders to potentially gain system administrator access without typing in a password. And who could forget the controversy that ensued after Apple revealed that it adjusted performance on older iPhones to prevent devices with aging batteries from shutting down?

That’s not to say iPhone owners shouldn’t expect any new features at all. Apple may make some announcements around augmented reality, digital health, and parental controls, according to Axios. It seems especially likely that Apple will devote some time to ARKit during its WWDC presentation, considering the augmented reality platform is still relatively new and the company will want to encourage developer enthusiasm. Other potential features, like updates to core apps and a refreshed home screen, may be pushed to 2019, according to the report.

There’s a strong chance Apple will also talk about what’s new for the Mac, Apple Watch, Apple TV and other devices, as it typically does. Considering the past several macOS updates have centered on making it easier to share content across all Apple devices and refining core apps like Mail and Photos, there’s a chance we’ll see Apple continue with that approach this year. Critically, Apple could use WWDC as an opportunity to get developers excited about Siri and its functionality on the HomePod, especially since early reviews indicated Apple’s virtual assistant had lagged behind the competition in certain areas.

Read more: 3 Things I Learned After One Month With Apple’s HomePod

New AirPods

Apple doesn’t usually announce new hardware products at its developer conference, but last year’s HomePod introduction proved to be an exception. Since Apple is rumored to be developing refreshed AirPods that include the company’s newer wireless chip, it’s possible we’ll see them debut at WWDC.

The new AirPods, which Bloomberg reported on in February, may be released sometime this year and could make it possible for wearers to access Apple’s digital assistant hands-free by saying “Hey Siri.” If Apple does plan to generate excitement around Siri at this year’s WWDC, it may be an opportune moment to unveil these rumored AirPods.

That same report also says Apple is planning to release new water-resistant AirPods next year, while Bloomberg separately reported that Apple may be designing new high-end headphones intended to rival those made by brands like Bose. But the latter two products seem farther off, making their appearance at WWDC seem less likely.

New story in Technology from Time: Theranos Founder Elizabeth Holmes Was Just Charged With ‘Massive Fraud.’ Here’s What the SEC Says She Did

On Wednesday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged Theranos founder and CEO Elizabeth Holmes and former president and chief operating officer Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani with “massive fraud.”

Theranos, a blood testing company, claimed that it could perform a wide-range of laboratory tests using just a finger prick’s worth of blood. The company was founded in 2003 by then-19-year-old Holmes, a Stanford dropout who was once seen as a Silicon Valley wunderkind.

The claims, if true, would have been revolutionary. Investors poured money into Theranos. The company was once valued at $9 billion.

The SEC settled with Theranos and Holmes, who did not deny or admit the allegations. In the settlement, which is subject to court approval, she will pay a “$500,000 penalty, be barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company for 10 years, return the remaining 18.9 million shares that she obtained during the fraud, and relinquish her voting control of Theranos by converting her super-majority Theranos Class B Common shares to Class A Common shares,” according to the SEC complaint.

The commission is pursuing charges against Balwani, who left the company in 2016, in federal district court in Northern California.

Why were Theranos, Holmes and Balwani charged?

“The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged Silicon Valley-based private company Theranos Inc., its founder and CEO Elizabeth Holmes and its former president Ramesh ‘Sunny’ Balwani with raising more than $700 million from investors through an elaborate, years-long fraud in which they allegedly exaggerated or made false statements about the company’s technology, business, and financial performance,” according to the SEC complaint.

The SEC alleges that Theranos made misleading media statements, investor presentations and more claiming that its blood testing technology (a machine known as the Edison) could perform far more laboratory tests than it really could. In reality, investors said, the company used traditional testing methods and machines built by other companies.

Additionally, the complaint charged that the company claimed its technology was used by the U.S. Department of Defense on the ground in Afghanistan. A presentation also boasted that Theranos was expected to “generate more than $100 million in revenue in 2014.”

The DOD never used Theranos, the complaint states, and the 2014 revenue was actually around $100,000.

Theranos gave the following statement to Forbes regarding the SEC charges: “The Company is pleased to be bringing this matter to a close and looks forward to advancing its technology.”

What’s the background in all of this?

The SEC spent over two years investigating the company after a 2015 Wall Street Journal story called the Theranos technology into question.

Reporter John Carreyrou, troubled by the company’s secrecy in a New Yorker article, investigated the company’s claims. His reporting alleged that the company was not using its signature technology to do the majority of the tests that it advertised — but was using traditional machines. Former employees who spoke to Carreyrou also reportedly worried about the accuracy of the signature technology, the Edison.

In 2016, after an investigation the company’s Newark, California lab, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a notice saying that “it was determined that the deficient practices of the laboratory pose immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety.”

In 2016, the company told regulators that it voided two years worth of tests, according the Wall Street Journal.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid revoked the company’s license to run the lab, and placed sanctions on Holmes forbidding her from owning or operating a lab for two years.

Theranos settled with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, in 2017. Theranos agreed to stay out of the blood testing business for two years in exchange for a smaller monetary penalty ($30,000) and the withdrawing of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid “revocation of the Theranos’ CLIA operating certificates,” according to Reuters.

In 2017, the company settled with Walgreens, which once partnered with the lab. It also settled a suit with a former backer, the hedge fund Partner Fund Management, which had invested millions in the company in 2014.

New story in Technology from Time: Fitbit’s Newest Fitness Tracker Is Just For Kids

Fitbit is launching a new fitness tracker designed for children called the Fitbit Ace, which will go on sale for $99.95 in the second quarter of this year.

The Fitbit Ace looks a lot like the company’s Alta tracker, but with a few child-friendly tweaks. The most important of which is Fitbit’s new family account option, which gives parents control over how their child uses their tracker and is compliant with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA. Parents must approve who their child can connect with via the Fitbit app and can view their kid’s activity progress and sleep trends, the latter of which can help them manage their children’s bedtimes.

Like many of Fitbit’s other products, the Fitbit Ace can automatically track steps, monitor active minutes, and remind kids to move when they’ve been still for too long. But while Fitbit’s default move goal is 30 minutes for adult users, the Ace’s will be 60 minutes, in line with the World Health Organization’s recommendation that children between the ages of five and 17 get an hour of daily physical activity per day. Fitbit says the tracker is designed for children eight years old and up.

Fitbit will also be introducing a Family Faceoff feature that lets kids compete in a five-day step challenge against the other members of their family account. The app also will reward children with in-app badges for achieving their health goals. Fitbit’s new child-friendly fitness band will be available in blue and purple, is showerproof, and should last for five days on a single charge.

The Ace launch is part of Fitbit’s broader goal of branching out to new audiences. The company also announced a new smartwatch on Tuesday called the Versa, which is being positioned as an everyday smartwatch rather than a fitness-only device or sports watch, like some of the company’s other products.

Above all else, the Ace is an effort to get children up and moving. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that the percentage of children and adolescents affected by obesity has more than tripled since the 1970’s. But parents who want to encourage their children to move already have several less expensive options to choose from. Garmin’s $79.99 Vivofit Jr. 2, for example, comes in themed skins like these Minnie Mouse and Star Wars versions, while the wristband entices kids to move by reflecting their fitness achievements in an accompanying smartphone game. The $39.99 Nabi Compete, meanwhile, is sold in pairs so that family members can work together to achieve movement milestones.

New story in Technology from Time: Fitbit Finally Made a Smartwatch I Can’t Wait to Wear

Despite being the company’s first effort to expand beyond fitness tracking, Fitbit’s Ionic smartwatch always felt like it was meant for the gym and little else. Now Fitbit wants to prove that it’s serious about broadening its reach with its upcoming Versa smartwatch, featuring an an all-new look that feels more like a high-end timepiece than a sports watch.

The Fitbit Versa is available for preorder now and launches in April for $199.95, making it much less expensive than both the $329 Apple Watch Series 3 and $299.95 Fitbit Ionic. The company is also releasing a $229.95 Versa Special Edition that includes support for Fitbit Pay, its mobile payment service.

Whereas last year’s Ionic looked very much like a runner’s watch, the Versa has a sleeker, polished appearance that more closely resembles the Apple Watch. The watch’s face has a softer look with rounded edges, while Fitbit will be selling new watch bands in various styles and colors similar to Apple’s accessories. Buyers will be able to choose from breathable rubbery sports bands for working out as well as options made from Horween leather, stainless steel, and metal mesh. The watch itself comes in black, silver, and rose gold color options.

Fitbit says the Versa is the thinnest metal smartwatch sold in the United States — take a look at the photo below to see how it compares to the 38 millimeter Apple Watch in terms of thickness:

Lisa EadiciccoThe Fitbit Versa and the Apple Watch

Read more: 5 Things About the Samsung Galaxy S9 I Liked Better Than Apple’s iPhone X

While the Versa brings some new “smart” capabilities, such as a feature that lets Android users send pre-written replies to text messages straight from the watch, the most significant changes involve health and wellness. Fitbit’s updated smartwatch software includes a new feature that helps women monitor their menstrual cycles, for instance. The capability will help women keep track of when their cycle occurs, as well as the frequency and severity of their symptoms, like cramps or headaches. Several existing apps serve similar purposes, but Fitbit wanted to make it possible for women to view this data in the same place as their other health stats.

Fitbit is enriching its interface for viewing health data on the wrist as well. The Fitbit Versa’s new dashboard view includes info that wearers could previously access only in Fitbit’s smartphone app, such as exercise summaries, resting heart rate trends over time, and wellness tips. Fitbit plans to add more features this year that can remind wearers to take their medication at specific times during day, congratulate wearers for completing fitness-related challenges, and allow them to log their meals.

Updates like menstrual cycle tracking and the redesigned dashboard will also be coming to the Fitbit Ionic in a software upgrade, the company says. The Versa will also include many of the health features Fitbit introduced in previous products, like its PurePulse heart rate monitor, a virtual coach that guides wearers through exercises, various exercise modes and more. But the Versa does not have a built-in GPS sensor like the Ionic; it uses your phone’s GPS to track your runs and other outdoor workouts.

Lisa EadiciccoThe Fitbit Versa

Read more: The 5 Best Podcast Apps for Android and iPhone

Fitbit’s announcement comes as Apple seeks to become a bigger player in the health space. In January, it announced that iPhone owners would be able to store and view their medical records from multiple health facilities in one place through Apple’s Health app. Apple also ships more wearable tech products worldwide than any other company, with 21 percent of the global market share in the fourth quarter of 2017, according to research firm IDC. Fitbit placed in second with 14.2% of the market. But when speaking with TIME last year, Fitbit CEO James Park didn’t seem bothered by the competition. “[Apple] started off the life of the Apple Watch thinking of it as kind of a computer on the wrist,” he said. “And they have shifted their position over time. It’s clear both of us feel that health and fitness is the killer app for this category.”

Fitbit’s app store is still far behind Apple’s when it comes to selection: Fitbit offers more than 550 apps from companies like Starbucks, Yelp, and Nest, while the Apple Watch had thousands of apps in 2015. But Fitbit does offer some worthwhile advantages. Its newest smartwatch is less expensive than the Apple Watch, it works across both iOS and Android devices (unlike Apple’s smartwatch), and Fitbit claims it can last for four days on a single charge, whereas the Apple Watch usually needs to be charged nightly. It’s also unclear whether or not the limited app selection actually makes a difference to users, considering the top two use cases for smartwatches are notifications and activity tracking, according to NPD Group, both of which are available on the Versa. All told, Fitbit’s new watch looks like it has the potential to be the Apple Watch’s most formidable rival yet.